home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT2109>
- <title>
- Aug. 14, 1989: Politics And Double Standards
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Aug. 14, 1989 The Hostage Agony
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 29
- Politics and Double Standards
- </hdr><body>
- <p>A Senate committee rejects another Bush appointee
- </p>
- <p> The sentiment was laudable, but its source was a surprise.
- There, arguing for the nomination of a black attorney to the
- Federal Government's top civil rights position, sat South
- Carolina Republican Strom Thurmond, who had once declared,
- "There's not enough troops in the Army to break down segregation
- and admit the Negro into our homes, our eating places, our
- swimming pools and our theaters." His current rationale: "It
- seems to me that we ought to give this black man a chance. Years
- ago, minorities didn't have a chance."
- </p>
- <p> Thurmond's astonishing plea for equal opportunity failed to
- sway a majority of the Democratic-controlled Senate Judiciary
- Committee. Twice the committee deadlocked, 7 to 7, on sending
- the nomination to the full Senate, effectively killing the
- appointment of William Lucas, 61, as Assistant Attorney General
- for Civil Rights. Republican committee members denounced the
- votes as bigoted and based on a double standard. Lucas was
- turned down, said Attorney General Dick Thornburgh in an angry
- statement, as a "result of raw politics."
- </p>
- <p> Was that really the case? During two days of hearings on
- his nomination, a coalition of civil rights organizations
- assailed Lucas for his lack of qualifications. The former FBI
- agent and Republican candidate for Governor of Michigan conceded
- that he "was new to the law." A practicing attorney for only two
- years, he had never tried a case, written a brief or argued an
- appeal. Most damaging, Lucas displayed a woeful ignorance of
- basic civil rights issues. Asked about the distinction between
- de facto (actual) and de jure (legal) segregation, Lucas drew
- a blank. "If it had been a white man who had been nominated who
- had the same background," said Alabama Democrat Howell Heflin,
- "he wouldn't have gotten anywhere. I think the fact that Mr.
- Lucas was black caused more consideration to be given to him."
- </p>
- <p> Double standards have, in fact, played a role in the
- Judiciary Committee's handling of the Administration's choices
- for important Justice Department posts. In July, Robert B.
- Fiske, a New York lawyer, was forced to withdraw his nomination
- as Deputy Attorney General. Reason: conservative Republicans led
- by Thurmond complained that Fiske, a highly experienced
- prosecutor, was too liberal.
- </p>
- <p> There was another element of hypocrisy in the Republican
- complaints. As Lucas' proponents are well aware, there is no
- such thing as an apolitical political appointment. The Bush
- Administration, which hopes to attract more black voters to the
- G.O.P., certainly had that goal in mind when it selected a
- black for the civil rights post. It has not ruled out giving
- Lucas a "recess appointment" to the job while Congress is out
- of session, which would allow him to serve until the end of 1990
- without being confirmed. But if the Administration goes that
- route, it is sure to anger the Senate, endangering the
- President's future appointments and proposals. When the Senate
- returns after Labor Day, the President and his Attorney General
- face another firefight over the nomination of Clarence Thomas,
- the ultraconservative black chairman of the Equal Employment
- Opportunity Commission, to the federal appeals court in
- Washington. That battle might give Thurmond another opportunity
- to cast himself as a sanctimonious champion of civil rights.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-